General
National Labor Relations Board v. F. W. Woolworth Co.
352 U.S. 938·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 413.
National Labor Relations Board v. F. W. Woolworth Co.
Solicitor General Rankin, Theophil C. Kammholz, Dominick L. Manoli and Frederick U. Reel for petitioner. John W. Burke, Jr. and George 0. Bahrs for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The Board acted within its allowable discretion in finding that under the circumstances of this case failure to furnish the wage information constituted an unfair labor practice. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co., 351 U. S. 149; cf. Universal Camera Corp. v. Labor Board, 340 U. S. 474.