General
Ernest V. Dunlevie, Appellant, Respondent, v. John R. Droney, Respondent, Appellant, Impleaded with Justin W. Spangenberg
149 A.D. 930·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1912·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ernest V. Dunlevie, Appellant, Respondent, v. John R. Droney, Respondent, Appellant, Impleaded with Justin W. Spangenberg.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, without costs. All concurred, except Spring, J., who dissented upon the ground that if the plaintiff is entitled to recover at all, he should recover for ah the timber on the tract, which so far as appears would naturally have been delivered to the river on the way to market.