Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, Appellant, v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Douglas, State of Colorado, et al.
245 U.S. 634·Supreme Court of the United States·1918
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 90.
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, Appellant, v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Douglas, State of Colorado, et al.
Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Argued December 14, 1917.
Decided January 7, 1918.
Mr. S. T. Bledsoe, Mr. Gardiner Lathrop and Mr. Henry T. Rogers for appellant.
Mr. A. L. Doud and Mr. B. C. Hilliard for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction .upon the authority of Phillips v. Negley, 117 U. S. 665, 671; Covington v. First National Bank, 185 U. S. 270; MacFarland v. Byrnes, 187 U. S. 246; United States v. Beatty, 232 U. S. 463. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.