Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
In the Matter of the Application of Emanuel Kind, Respondent, to Punish Henry Gottlieb, Appellant, et al., as for a Contempt of Court
168 N.Y. 596·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Emanuel Kind, Respondent, to Punish Henry Gottlieb, Appellant, et al., as for a Contempt of Court.
Matter of Kind v. Gottlieb, 60 App. Div. 630, appeal dismissed.
(Argued June 6, 1901;
decided October 1, 1901.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 17, 1901, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to open a default and to set aside and vacate an order adjudging the appellant herein and certain others in default and punishing them therefor.
John Laughlin and II. J. Morris for appellant.
Mortimer M. Menken for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Landon, Cullen and Werner, JJ.