General
Hulda Friedlander, Bespondent, v. James F. D. Lanier, Appellant
143 A.D. 922·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1911·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hulda Friedlander, Bespondent, v. James F. D. Lanier, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 22d day of June, 1910, upon the verdict of a jury and from an order entered on the 24th day of June, 1910, denying a motion for a new trial.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The judgment should be reversed on the ground that the finding that the defendant was negligent is against the weight of evidence. The judgment and order appealed from are reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Miller and Dowling, JJ. Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.