Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Joseph C. Potts, Respondent, v. The Norfolk and Petersburgh Railroad Company, Appellant
61 N.Y. 636·New York Commission of Appeals·1874·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joseph C. Potts, Respondent, v. The Norfolk and Petersburgh Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued May 28, 1874;
decided September term, 1874.)
This action was brought to recover the amount of certain coupons upon negotiable bonds issued by defendant. The defence was, that the bonds, with the coupons attached, were stolen from defendant, and that plaintiff was not a Iona fide purchaser for value. The referee found, on evidence which the commission deemed sufficient, that plaintiff purchased of a bona fide holder, having no notice himself of any defect, that he made the purchase with his own funds, intending, at the time, to purchase for the benefit of a son-in-law, but, on subsequently hearing of the alleged defect, concluded to keep them. No question was made in the court below that the son-in-law was the owner and' had an interest in the bonds. Held, that the question could not be raised here; but if raised it would not avail defendant, as the son-in-law had no interest, and could acquire no title without the assent of plaintiff.
Roger A. Pryor for the appellant.
S. B. Brownell for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Gray, C.,]
Gray, C.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.