Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Adolf Prince, Respondent, v. Leo Schlesinger, as Receiver of the Federal Bank of New York, Appellant
190 N.Y. 546·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Adolf Prince, Respondent, v. Leo Schlesinger, as Receiver of the Federal Bank of New York, Appellant.
Prince v. Schlesinger, 116 App. Div. 500, affirmed.
(Argued December 6, 1907;
decided December 20, 1907.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered
December 28, 1906, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon the report of a referee in an action to recover rent alleged to be due.
George IF. Glaze for appellant.
Fmamuel J. Myers for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute' ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, IIisoook and Chase, JJ.