Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
John D. KEY, in His Own Behalf and as the Guardian of Margaret Key, et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. PANAMA RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant in Error
18 F.2d 1017·United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·1927
Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John D. KEY, in His Own Behalf and as the Guardian of Margaret Key, et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. PANAMA RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant in Error.
Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
April 8, 1927.
No. 4965.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Canal Zone; Guy H. Martin, Judge.
Chauncey P. Fairman, of Cristobal, Canal Zone, and Harmodio Arias, of Panama City, Panama, for plaintiffs in error.
Newton A. Becker and John O. Collins, both of Ancon, Canal Zone, for defendant in error.
Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.
Rehearing denied May 23, 1927.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On the authority of the decision in the case of Panama Railroad Co. v. Rock, 266 U. S. 209, 45 S. Ct. 58, 69 L. Ed. 250, the judgment in this case is affirmed.