Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Sarah E. Kelly, Respondent, v. The Home Savings Bank of the City of Albany et al., Appellants
182 N.Y. 568·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sarah E. Kelly, Respondent, v. The Home Savings Bank of the City of Albany et al., Appellants.
(Argued October 7, 1905;
decided October 24, 1905.)
Kelly v. Home Savings Bank, 103 App. Div. 141 appeal withdrawn.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 8, 1905, which reversed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term and granted a new trial.
M. H. Merwin and William P. Rudd for appellants.
Andrew J. Nellis for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal withdrawn on payment of costs of appeal in this court.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Cray, Bartlett, Haight, Yann " and Werner, JJ. Absent: O’Brien, J.