General
Hormisdas De Loge, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant
157 N.Y. 688·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hormisdas De Loge, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.
Be Loge v. N. Y. 0. & H. B. B. B. Go., 92 Hun, 149, affirmed.
(Submitted October 11, 1898;
decided October 25, 1898.)
Appeal from a judgment and order of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 9, 1896, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Purcell, Wallter <& Burns for appellant.
Smith cé Smith for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except O’Brien, J., not voting, and Martin, J., not sitting.