Administrative
George W. Cassidy et al., Respondents, v. William H. Schedel et al., Appellants
71 N.Y. 603·New York Court of Appeals·1877·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George W. Cassidy et al., Respondents, v. William H. Schedel et al., Appellants.
(Submitted November, 12, 1877;
decided November 27, 1877.)
William Hildredth Field, for appellants.
Blumenstiel & Ascher, for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Church, Ch. J., Rapallo, Andrews and Earl, JJ.,]
Church, Ch. J., Rapallo, Andrews and Earl, JJ.,
agree to affirm, without opinion; Miller, J., reads for reversal and new trial; Allen and Folger, JJ., concur in result.
Judgment affirmed.