Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Tax
WALTER FLEISHER CO., INC. v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al.
449 U.S. 608101 S. Ct. 933·Supreme Court of the United States·1981
Justice Stewart took no part in the decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WALTER FLEISHER CO., INC. v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al.
No. 79-700.
Argued November 4, 1980
Decided January 26, 1981
Gerald T. Manpearl argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
Philip H. Hickok argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were John H. Larson and DeWitt W. Clinton
Jomne M. Garvey, Michael Wells, and Roy E. Crawford filed a brief for the Committee on Unitary Tax as amicus curiae.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Justice Stewart took no part in the decision of this case.