General
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company, Petitioner, v. Erastus W. Willard, Administrator, etc.
212 U.S. 578·Supreme Court of the United States·1908
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 627.
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company, Petitioner, v. Erastus W. Willard, Administrator, etc.
December 7, 1908.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for a writ of certiorari.to.the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit granted. Mr. Albert J. Hopkins for petitioner. Mr. Arthur J. Eddy and Mr. E. C. Wetten for respondent.