Tax
RUCKER, Collector, v. COCO-COLA CO.
125 F. 1004·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1903
Before PARDEE, McCORMICK, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
RUCKER, Collector, v. COCO-COLA CO.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
October 17, 1903.)
No. 1,239.
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Georgia.
E. A. Angier, Geo. L. Bell, and C. D. Camp, for plaintiff in error. Reuben R. Arnold, for defendant in error.
Before PARDEE, McCORMICK, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
As we find that the taxable character of Coco-Cola, under the revenue act, was settled adversely to the United States in the former adjudication (117 Fed. 1006, 54 C. C. A. 248), duly pleaded on the trial, the record herein presents no reversible error, and the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.