Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Wells, Administratrix, v. Simonds Abrasive Co.
344 U.S. 815·Supreme Court of the United States·1952
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 52,
Misc.
Wells, Administratrix, v. Simonds Abrasive Co.
Henry S. Drinker, Charles J. Biddle and Francis Hop-kinson for petitioner.
Philip Price for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted limited to question No. 2 presented by the petition for the writ, i. e.:
“Does not the Pennsylvania Statute, as construed by the Court below, violate the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution?”