Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Adrian II. Jackson, Respondent, v. The Lawyers' Surety Company of New York, Appellant
184 N.Y. 521·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Adrian II. Jackson, Respondent, v. The Lawyers’ Surety Company of New York, Appellant.
Jackson v. Lawyers’ Surety Co., 95 App. Div. 368, affirmed.
(Argued January 23, 1906;
decided February 6, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court ill the first judicial department, entered July 11, 1904, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict directed by the court and directing judgment in favor of plaintiff for the relief demanded in the complaint.
Francis Smyth and George W. Wickersham for appellant.
Edward W. S. Johnston for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, Hisoook and Chase, JJ.