Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Jacob S. Jackson, Appellant, v. Grace Sheridan et al., Respondents
50 N.Y. 660·New York Court of Appeals·1872·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jacob S. Jackson, Appellant, v. Grace Sheridan et al., Respondents.
Argued April 29, 1872;
decided November 12, 1872.)
This case was argued with House v. Jackson (ante, p. 161). It had reference to the same title and presented the same questions as were considered and disposed of in Moore v. Liitel (41 N. Y., 66), and was decided upon the authority of that case.
E. P. Wheeler and F. J. Fithia/n for the appellant.
D. P. Barnard for the respondents.
[MAJORITY — Peckham, J.,]
Peckham, J.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.