General
Warren F. Rollins, Doing Business under the Firm Name of Rollins Bros., Respondent, v. James W. Armstrong, Individually and as Superintendent of Buildings of the City of Yonkers, Appellant
226 A.D. 809·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1929·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Warren F. Rollins, Doing Business under the Firm Name of Rollins Bros., Respondent, v. James W. Armstrong, Individually and as Superintendent of Buildings of the City of Yonkers, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Leave to appeal is not necessary. (Civ. Prae. Act, § 588, subd. 1.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Seeger, JJ.