Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
McClellan v. Ohio
393 U.S. 929·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 600,
Mise.
McClellan v. Ohio.
Harry Friberg for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied. The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice Fortas concur in the denial of certiorari, pointing out that the issues under Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U. S. 510, can be decided only upon consideration of a transcript of the voir dire of the jury, which is not now in the record but which can presumably be made available in state or federal collateral proceedings.