General
McHARG, RECEIVER, et al., v. STAAKE
202 U.S. 15050 L. Ed. 971·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Peckham dissented',in both cases.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
McHARG, RECEIVER, et al., v. STAAKE.
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT.
No. 214.
Argued March 15, 16, 1906,
Decided April 30, 1906.
This case was argued simultaneously with First National Bank v. Staake; for names of counsel see p. 144, ante.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
As the facts in this case are practically the same as those set forth in the preceding and the legal principles are identical, this is also
Affirmed.
Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Peckham dissented',in both cases.