Contracts · MBE-tested
EICHELBAUM v. SCOTT et al.
172 F. 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1909
Before PRITCHARD, Circuit Judge, and BOYD and DAYTON, District Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
EICHELBAUM v. SCOTT et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
March 9, 1909.)
No. 876.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg.
J. E. Edmunds and G. B. Caskie, for appellant.
F. W. Whitaker, for appellees.
Before PRITCHARD, Circuit Judge, and BOYD and DAYTON, District Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
After due consideration of the questions involved in this controversy, we are of opinion that there is no error in the ruling of the court below. Affirmed.