Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
United States et al. v. New York et al.
329 U.S. 667·Supreme Court of the United States·1946
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 440.
United States et al. v. New York et al.
October 7, 1946.
Attorney General Clark, Solicitor General McGrath, Assistant Attorney General Berge, Edward H. Miller, David 0. Mathews, Daniel W. Knowlton and /. Stanley Payne for appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York.
Dismissed on motion of counsel for the appellants.