General
Horace T. Rowley, Respondent, v. Rachel Feldman et al., Defendants. Thomas F. Baldwin, Appellant
173 N.Y. 607·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Horace T. Rowley, Respondent, v. Rachel Feldman et al., Defendants. Thomas F. Baldwin, Appellant.
Rowley v. Feldman, 74 App. Div. 492, affirmed.
(Argued January 6, 1903;
decided January 20, 1903.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered August 4, 1902, which modified and affirmed as modified an ' order of Special Term fixing the amount to be paid by appellant herein as a defaulting purchaser at a foreclosure sale.
Charles C. Sanders and John Vincent for appellant.
John Ewen for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Martin, Vann and Cullen, JJ.