Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Maria D. Mitchell, as Sole Surviving Executrix of Aaron H. Mitchell, Deceased, Appellant, v. Frank H. Ball et al., as Executors of Edwin J. Dixon, Deceased, Respondents
154 N.Y. 739·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Maria D. Mitchell, as Sole Surviving Executrix of Aaron H. Mitchell, Deceased, Appellant, v. Frank H. Ball et al., as Executors of Edwin J. Dixon, Deceased, Respondents.
Mitchell v. Ball, 88 Hun, 614, affirmed.
(Argued October 8, 1897;
decided October 26, 1897.)
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered August 20, 1895, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon the report of a referee dismissing the complaint upon the merits.
Chester M. Elliott for appellant.
■John T>. Teller for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
•Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.