Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
In the Matter of the Accounting of William J. Riley, as Administrator of the Estate of John Martin, Deceased. William J. Riley, Individually and as Administrator, et al., Appellants; Dennis Greeley et al., Respondents
183 N.Y. 576·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Accounting of William J. Riley, as Administrator of the Estate of John Martin, Deceased. William J. Riley, Individually and as Administrator, et al., Appellants; Dennis Greeley et al., Respondents.
(Argued January 9, 1906;
decided January 23, 1906.)
Matter of Riley, 109 App. Div. 915, affirmed.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 24, 1905, which affirmed a decree of the Kings County Surrogate’s Court directing distribution of the estate of John Martin, deceased.
John R. Kuhn and P. J. McGoldrick for appellants.
Melville J. France for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur : Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Haight, Vann, "Werner and Hiscock, JJ. Not sitting: Willard Bartlett, J.