General
Samuel Zirn, Appellant, v. Clifton N. Bradley, and Philip L. Carret, Paul A. Gammons and Said Clifton N. Bradley, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name of Carret, Gammons & Co., Respondents, and Others, Defendants
258 A.D. 817·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1939·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Samuel Zirn, Appellant, v. Clifton N. Bradley, and Philip L. Carret, Paul A. Gammons and Said Clifton N. Bradley, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name of Carret, Gammons & Co., Respondents, and Others, Defendants.
[MAJORITY]
Action for libel. Order denying plaintiff’s motion (a) to be relieved of his failure timely to move with regard to the affirmative defenses pleaded in the answer of several named defendants, pursuant to rule ln9 of the Rules of Civil Practice; and (b) upon being so relieved for an order striking out the affirmative defenses as .insufficient in law, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.