Torts · MBE-tested
ROCHESTER WOVEN BELTING CORPORATION, Inc., v. UNITED STATES
43 F.2d 264·United States Court of Claims·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ROCHESTER WOVEN BELTING CORPORATION, Inc., v. UNITED STATES.
No. J—115.
Court of Claims.
June 16, 1930.
George M. Wilmeth, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.
R. C. Williamson, of Washington, D. C., and Herman J. Galloway, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This case as to the facts is almost identical with the Advance Automobile Accessories Corporation Case, 66 Ct. Cl. 304, in Avhieh the petition was dismissed and certiorari refused. We hold that this ease is ruled by that ease, and the petition should be dismissed and it is so ordered.
See Universal Battery Co. v. United States, 281 U. S. 580, 50 S. Ct. 422, 74 L. Ed. 1051, decided May 26, 1930.