Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Louise Henninger KING, as Executrix of John Pierce King, Deceased, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
69 F.2d 1009·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Louise Henninger KING, as Executrix of John Pierce King, Deceased, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 6557.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 14, 1933.
John L. Early, of Sarasota, Fla., for appellant.
The United States Attorney, of Jacksonville, Fla., for the United States.
Before BRYAN, FOSTER, and SIBLEY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The above numbered and entitled cause, coming on to be heard, comes the appellee therein and confesses that in the record and proceedings of the court below therein there is reversible error. Because of such error so confessed, it is ordered and adjudged that the judgment of said District Court in said canse be and the same is reversed, and that said cause be remanded to said District Court, with direction that a new trial thereof be granted.