Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Jules C. Caritey, Appellant, v. Frederick H. Eggers et al. Respondents
188 N.Y. 636·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jules C. Caritey, Appellant, v. Frederick H. Eggers et al. Respondents.
(Argued May 20, 1907;
decided May 21, 1907.)
Reported below, 116 App. Div. 909.
Motion to dismiss an appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 14, 1906, which affirmed an order of Special Term vacating the service of the summons and complaint on one of the defendants herein.
The motion was made upon the ground that the notice of appeal and undertaking thereon were not served until after the time to appeal had expired.
FranTc H. Deal for motion.
Melville B. Mendell opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.