Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co. et al.; Aberdeen Motor Supply Co. v. Same; and F. E. Rowe Sales Co. v. Same
303 U.S. 639·Supreme Court of the United States·1938
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 674.
No. 675.
No. 676.
Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co. et al.; Aberdeen Motor Supply Co. v. Same; and F. E. Rowe Sales Co. v. Same.
February 14, 1938.
Messrs. Thomas O. Haight, George L. Wilkinson, John H. Brun-inga, and John H. Sutherland for petitioners. Messrs. A. C. Denison, F. 0. Richey and 17m. C. McCoy for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Reported below: 92 F. 2d 330.