General
United States v. Antelope et al.
429 U.S. 892·Supreme Court of the United States·1976
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 75-661.
United States v. Antelope et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 424 U. S. 907.] Motions of respondents for' leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis granted. Motions for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that John W. Walker, Esquire, of Moscow, Idaho, serve as counsel for respondents Leonard Francis Davison and William Andrew Davison, and that Allen. V. Bowles, Esquire, of Moscow, Idaho, serve as counsel for respondent Antelope in this case.