Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
The Reynolds Card Manufacturing Company, Respondent, v. New York Bank Note Company, Appellant
157 N.Y. 687·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Reynolds Card Manufacturing Company, Respondent, v. New York Bank Note Company, Appellant.
Reynolds Gwrd Go. v. N. T. Bank Note Co., 91 Hun, 468, affirmed.
(Argued October 10, 1898;
decided October 25, 1898.)
Appeal from a judgment and order of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered respectively December 31 and 24, 1895, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Edward P. Lyon for appellant.
Lorenz Zeller for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
J udgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Parker, Ch. J., not sitting.