General
In the Matter of the Application of Armando Bianco, Petitioner, for an Order of Review against Henry E. Bruckman, Chairman, Edward Schoeneck and Others, Constituting the State Liquor Authority of the State of New York, Respondents, as Provided for in Article 78 of the Civil Practice Act of the State of New York
259 A.D. 720·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1940·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Armando Bianco, Petitioner, for an Order of Review against Henry E. Bruckman, Chairman, Edward Schoeneck and Others, Constituting the State Liquor Authority of the State of New York, Respondents, as Provided for in Article 78 of the Civil Practice Act of the State of New York.
[MAJORITY]
Determination of the State Liquor Authority of the State of New York canceling the appellant’s [petitioner’s] winery license unanimously confirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.