Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
PORET et al. v. SIGLER, WARDEN
355 U.S. 60·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
PORET et al. v. SIGLER, WARDEN.
No. 268,
Misc.
Decided November 18, 1957.
G. W. Gill and Gerard H. Schreiber for petitioners.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and in view of the action of the Supreme Court of Louisiana on September 25, 1957, in Poret v. Sigler and Poret v. Louisiana, Nos. 269 and 270, Misc., O. T. 1957, certiorari denied this day [post, p. 879], the judgments heretofore entered are vacated, and the cause is remanded to the District Court for consideration of the application for habeas corpus. The stay heretofore entered is continued in effect until final disposition of the case in the District Court.