Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
The Franklin National Bank of the City of New York, Respondent, v. Isaac B. Newcombe et al., Appellants
157 N.Y. 699·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Franklin National Bank of the City of New York, Respondent, v. Isaac B. Newcombe et al., Appellants.
Franklin National Bank v. Newcombe, 1 App. Div. 294, affirmed.
(Argued October 28, 1898;
decided November 22, 1898.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 15, 1896, upon an order affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court.
Treadwell Cleveland for appellants.
Philip Carpenter and Jonathan C. Poss for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.