Contracts · MBE-tested
Mester et al. v. United States et al.
332 U.S. 749·Supreme Court of the United States·1947
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 173.
Mester et al. v. United States et al.
Philip J. Hennessey, Jr., Paul M. Segal, Bernard Noskin and Harry P. Warner for appellants.
Acting Solicitor General Washington for the United States and the Federal Communications Commission; Sanford H. Cohen for Bulova et al.; and Lynne A. Warren for O’Dea, appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Federal Communications Comm’n v. WOKO, 329 U. S. 223. Mr. Justice Black took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.