General

State of Connecticut v. Marvin Syms

34 Conn. App. 910·Connecticut Appellate Court·1994·CT

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

State of Connecticut v. Marvin Syms (13234) Lavery, Freedman and Schaller, Js. Argued April 26 decision released May 17, 1994 Suzanne Zitser, assistant public defender, with whom, on the brief, was G. Douglas Nash, public defender, for the appellant (defendant). Marjorie Allen Dauster, assistant state’s attorney, with whom, on the brief, were James E. Thomas, state’s attorney, and Edward R. Narus, assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state). [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. The judgment is affirmed. Pursuant to Practice Book § 4023, the Supreme Court transferred this appeal to this court.