General
HIGHWAY EXPRESS LINES, INC., et al. v. JONES MOTOR CO., INC.
377 U.S. 217·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Goldberg are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HIGHWAY EXPRESS LINES, INC., et al. v. JONES MOTOR CO., INC.
No. 900.
Decided May 18, 1964.
Robert H. Young and William E. Zeiter for appellants in No. 900.
William A. Ooichman, Edward Munce and Joseph C. Bruno for appellant in No. 977.
Roland Rice and Christian V. Craf for appellee.
Solicitor General Cox and Robert W. Ginnane filed a memorandum for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission in both cases.
Together with No. 977, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Jones Motor Co., Inc., also on appeal from the same court.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Goldberg are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.