Bankruptcy
Palwinder SINGH, Debtor-Appellant, v. Thomas Patrick GORMAN, Trustee-Appellee, and USBC-Alexandria, Party-in-Interest
710 F. App'x 138·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·2018
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Palwinder SINGH, Debtor-Appellant, v. Thomas Patrick GORMAN, Trustee-Appellee, and USBC-Alexandria, Party-in-Interest.
No. 17-1981
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: January 30, 2018
Decided: February 1, 2018
Palwinder Singh, Appellant Pro Se.
Marcelo Ramiro Michel, OFFICE OF THE CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM:]
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Palwinder Singh appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing his Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition. We have reviewed the record provided on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Singh v. Gorman, No. 1:17-cv-00266-TSE-MSN (E.D. Va. filed June 23, 2017; entered June 26, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED