Constitutional Law · MBE-tested
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Angel Santiago, Appellant
156 A.D.3d 41964 N.Y.S.3d 516·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2017·NY
Concur—Gische, J.P., Kapnick, Oing and Moulton, JJ.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Angel Santiago, Appellant.
[64 NYS3d 516]
[MAJORITY]
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Farber, J.), entered on or about January 17, 2013, which adjudicated defendant a level one sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendant’s challenge to his designation as a sexually violent offender is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. In any event, the court properly designated defendant a sexually violent offender because he was convicted of an enumerated sexually violent offense, and the court lacked discretion to do otherwise (see People v Bullock, 125 AD3d 1 [1st Dept 2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 915 [2015]). We decline to revisit our prior holdings on this issue. Defendant’s due process argument is similarly unpreserved and unavailing.
Concur—Gische, J.P., Kapnick, Oing and Moulton, JJ.