General
In the Matter of Morris H. Siegel, Appellant, against Harold J. Crawford, Justice of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Respondent. Mae Harding, Intervener-Respondent
265 A.D. 877·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1942·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Morris H. Siegel, Appellant, against Harold J. Crawford, Justice of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Respondent. Mae Harding, Intervener-Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
The only method of review available is by a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act. (Matter of Pugh v. Winter, 166 Misc. Rep. 95; modfd. and affd., 253 App. Div. 295.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.