General
In the Matter of Terry Curtis, Appellant, v. Penelope Curtis, Respondent
245 A.D.2d 1148666 N.Y.S.2d 864·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1997·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Terry Curtis, Appellant, v Penelope Curtis, Respondent.
[666 NYS2d 864]
[MAJORITY]
—Motion for permission to proceed as poor person and for assignment of counsel denied and appeal dismissed without costs. Memorandum: The notice of appeal limits the scope of the appeal to the purge provision (see, CPLR 5515 [1]; Sommers v Sommers, 203 AD2d 975, 977; Royal v Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 122 AD2d 132, 133), which has expired; thus, appellant is no longer aggrieved by that provision and is not entitled to appeal (see, CPLR 5511; Family Ct Act § 1118). Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Doerr and Balio, JJ.