Torts · MBE-tested
Wolf Goldstein, Respondent, v. Schwaezschild & Sulzberger Company, Appellant
143 A.D. 923·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1911·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Wolf Goldstein, Respondent, v. Schwaezschild & Sulzberger Company, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment, entered on the 1st day of July, 1910, on a verdict, and from an order entered on the 30th day of June, 1910, denying a motion for a new trial.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The judgment and order appealed from should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, on the ground that there is no evidence to justify the finding of the jury that the defendant was guilty of negligence. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Miller and Dowling, JJ. Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.