General

Jules Silver v. Terry E. Barth et al.

20 Conn. App. 827·Connecticut Appellate Court·1990·CT

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Jules Silver v. Terry E. Barth et al. (8374) Spallone, O’Connell and Foti, Js. Argued January 31 decision released February 8, 1990 JohnR. Williams, with whom, on the brief, was Leslie R. Barth, for the appellant (named defendant). Irving H. Perlmutter, for the appellee (plaintiff). [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. This appeal arises out of a foreclosure of a judgment lien against the named defendant Terry Barth. The defendant claims the court erred (1) in rendering judgment against the defendant without first holding a hearing in damages, (2) in rendering judgment without first acting on the defendant’s motion to reopen a default, and (3) in failing to open the default entered against the defendant. After a plenary reivew of the record, transcripts and briefs, and after affording each claim of error the appropriate scope of review, we conclude that all claims are without merit. Schiavone v. Schiavone, 18 Conn. App. 825, 559 A.2d 1192 (1989). There is no error.