General
Joseph Rodgers, an Infant, by Eugene Rodgers, His Guardian ad Litem, and Eugene Rodgers, Appellants, v. Thomas Ward, Respondent, and Arthur Kimball, Defendant
256 A.D. 986·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1939·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joseph Rodgers, an Infant, by Eugene Rodgers, His Guardian ad Litem, and Eugene Rodgers, Appellants, v. Thomas Ward, Respondent, and Arthur Kimball, Defendant.
(Appeal No. 2.)
[MAJORITY]
Order denying plaintiffs’ motion to' strike out the separate defense contained in the answer of defendant Ward affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur. [169 Mise. 559.]