Criminal Law · MBE-tested
EDWARDS et al. v. UNITED STATES
258 F. 989·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1919
Before KNAPP and WOODS, Circuit Judges, and ROSE, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
EDWARDS et al. v. UNITED STATES.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
April 22, 1919.)
No. 1701.
Tn Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk; Edmund IVaddill, Jr., Judge. Criminal prosecution by the United States against Samuel Edwards and Lee Edwards. Judgment of conviction, and defendants bring error.
Affirmed.
Nathaniel T. Green, of Norfolk, Va., for plaintiffs in error.
Hiram M. Smith, U. S. Atty., of Richmond, Va.
Before KNAPP and WOODS, Circuit Judges, and ROSE, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER GURIAM.]
PER GURIAM.
Careful examination of the record in this case shows that the judge was so clearly right, and the principles of law so simple and well established, that no statement of reasons for affirming the judgment would be of value. Affirmed.