General
Taub, Hummel & Schnall, Inc., et al. v. United States
18 Cust. Ct. 507·United States Customs Court·1947
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Taub, Hummel & Schnall, Inc., et al. v. United States
No. 7097.
Entry No. 702106, etc.
Invoices dated Nottingham, England, June 12, 1946, etc.
Certified June 18, 1946, etc.
Entered at New York, N. Y., July 9, 1946, etc.
(Decided March 26, 1947)
Siegel, Mandell & Davidson for the plaintiffs.
Paul P. Rao, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
[MAJORITY — Lawrence, Judge:]
Lawrence, Judge:
It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the above-mentioned merchandise are the same in all material respects as those decided in United States v. Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp., 33 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 183, C. A. D. 334, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.
Upon the agreed facts I find the export value, defined in section' 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for determining the values of said merchandise, and that such values are the appraised values, less additions made by importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.