General
Dora Rubenstein et al., Respondents, v. Bernard R. Silbert, Defendant. (Action No. 1.); Dora Rubenstein et al., Respondents, v. Incorporated Village of Valley Stream, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)
279 A.D. 878·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1952·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Dora Rubenstein et al., Respondents, v. Bernard R. Silbert, Defendant. (Action No. 1.) Dora Rubenstein et al., Respondents, v. Incorporated Village of Valley Stream, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)
[MAJORITY]
The affidavit in support of the motion shows no facts which should lead the court in its discretion to override the provisions of section 341-e of the Village Law. (Bagan v. Fritz, 274 App. Div. 1082.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur. [200 Misc. 399.]