General

U.S. Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. K.J. Enterprises, Inc., et al.

19 Conn. App. 806·Connecticut Appellate Court·1989·CT

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

U.S. Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. K.J. Enterprises, Inc., et al. (6466) Dupont, C. J., Borden and Daly, Js. Argued June 7 — decision released July 19, 1989 Frank X. Lo Sacco, pro se, the appellant (defendant). Kirk D. Tavtigian, Jr., with whom were James J. Tancredi, and Susan J. Barnes, for the appellee (plaintiff). [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. The plaintiff instituted this action against the defendants for breach of an indemnity agreement and to set aside certain conveyances of property as fraudulent. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and an award of attorneys fees and expenses, the defendant has appealed. The defendant raises ten claims of error on appeal that attack either the court’s factual findings or its exercise of discretion. We have fully reviewed each of the defendant’s claims and conclude that the court’s findings are not clearly erroneous, and that its actions were clearly within its discretion. See Della Pietra v. American Factors, Inc., 18 Conn. App. 812, 556 A.2d 1064 (1989). There is no error.