General
Ellen Shaw Barlow, Respondent, v. Peter Schmuck, as Presiding Justice of the City Court of the City of New York, and Others, Appellants, Impleaded with William J. Toumey, and Another, Appellants
223 A.D. 716·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1928·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ellen Shaw Barlow, Respondent, v. Peter Schmuck, as Presiding Justice of the City Court of the City of New York, and Others, Appellants, Impleaded with William J. Toumey, and Another, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, McAvoy and Proskauer, JJ.